|
|
Clothing, like
other aspects of
human physical appearance,
has various
social aspects. Wearing
specific types of clothing
or the manner of wearing
clothing can have the
deliberate purpose, or the
desirable or undesirable
side-effect, to
correctly or incorrectly be
interpreted in terms of
class,
income,
belief and
attitude. For example,
wearing expensive clothes
can be due to (a combination
of)
- being rich
- liking to spend much
money (as much as one
can afford or even more)
- spending one's money
for a large part on
clothing
- managing to obtain
clothing cheaper than
usual
An observer can see the
resultant, expensive
clothes, but may be wrong
about the extent to which
the four factors apply. See
also
conspicuous consumption.
All factors apply reversedly
for wearing cheap clothes,
and similarly for other
goods such as a house, a
car, etc.
Other messages clothing
can give:
Dress codes
Dress codes may apply:
Legal dress code
- Main articles:
Sumptuary law,
and
[[]],
and
[[]],
and
[[]], and [[]]
Almost universally
nudity in a
public place is illegal,
except in special
nudist areas, which
exist in fairly many
countries. (However, among
some peoples full nudity is
accepted or the norm.) For
woman bare breasts are also
often illegal; however, see
also
topfree equality. In a
non-public place nudity
tends to be forbidden if
another person is
unwillingly confronted with
it.
Wearing only
underwear is
sometimes also illegal, and
in some countries even less
bare skin may already be
illegal, especially for
women.
Cross-dressing may also
be illegal, especially a man
wearing women's clothing.
In
Tonga it is illegal for
men to appear in public
without shirt.
See also
indecent exposure,
trousers and the law.
Other dress codes
Dress codes function on
certain social occasions and
for certain jobs. A
school or a
military institution may
require specified
uniforms; if it
allows the wearing of plain
clothes it may place
restrictions on their use. A
bouncer of a
disco or
nightclub may judge
visitors' clothing and
refuse entrance to those not
clad according to specified
or intuited requirements:
for example an establishment
may not allow the wearing of
sport shoes.
A formal or
white
tie dress code
typically means Tail-coats
for men and full-length
evening dresses for women.
Semi-formal has a
much less precise definition
but typically means an
evening jacket and tie for
men (known as
black
tie) and a dress
for women.
Lounge suit also known
as Business casual
typically means not wearing
jeans
or
track suits, but wearing
instead collared shirts, and
more country trousers
(not black, but more
relaxed, including
things such as
corduroy).
Casual typically just
means clothing for the
torso, legs and shoes.
Transparent or
semi-transparent clothing
can play with the boundaries
of dress-codes regarding
modesty, for example: in
a
wet T-shirt contest.
Dress codes usually set
forth a lower bound on body
covering. However, sometimes
it can specify the opposite,
for example, in UK gay
jargon, dress code,
means people who dress in a
militaristic manner.
Dress code nights in
nightclubs, and elsewhere,
are deemed to specifically
target people who have
militaristic fetishes (e.g.
leather/skinhead
men).
Setting a dress code can
often lead to great
embarrassment. One
particularly famous example
is that of UK
Chancellor of the Exchequer,
Gordon Brown, who asked
the
Bank of England's board
to wear
lounge suits to their
annual dinner, a highly
prestigious occasion, as an
act of modernism in tune
with
New Labour thinking
(they usually wore
white
tie). However, he
had not reckoned with their
determination not to kow-tow,
and when sat at dinner, he
was the only person not
dressed in
white
tie, to his
humiliation, and the glee of
the UK
broadsheets.
See also
shoe
etiquette,
mourning,
sharia.
|
|
 |
|
|
Search the internet for
additional Textile
& Clothing definitions and
Glossaries. |
|
|
Weaving
Machinery Directory
Loose
Needles for Knitting Machinery
|
| |
No shoes, no shirt, no service
Whereas in much of Europe, and in particular
in Italy, dressing well is standard
behaviour, in America the norm is for a more
dressed down appearance. The aphorism "no
shoes,
no shirt, no service" captures their
commonly promulgated dress code, and
sometimes appears on signs posted at
commercial establishments such as
restaurants and shopping malls. Another
common aphorism claims "this store is not a
beach", a phrase recited almost
automatically by store employees when
encountering someone who does not meet the
minimum standards of body covering, modesty,
decency, or the like.
Beaches and
urban beaches push these boundaries, as
people wander from a beachlike setting to
stores and restaurants nearby. Many of the
stores and restaurants on or near beaches
have such dress codes but do not enforce
them. For example, the Sunnyside Cafe,
located at the Sunnyside Bathing Pavilion in
Toronto,
Canada, often does not enforce the
"shirts, shoes" dress code.
The "no shoes, no shirt" slogan appears so
prevalently in some settings that it has
become the target of mockery and flagrant
disregard. Groups that don't like dress
codes, such as
barefooters, often deliberately
disregard this specific dress code, as a
form of
breaching experiment or beaching
experiment. Such
action research, as well as
activism, including deliberate violation
by lawyers (deliberately violating no-shirts
and no-shoes laws), is becoming more common.
Musicians have also mocked this dress code,
for instance
Kenny Chesney sings the song
No Shirt, No Shoes, No Problems.
Inverse dress codes
Reverse dress codes, sometimes referred
to as "undress codes", set forth an upper
bound, rather than a lower bound, on body
covering. An example of an undress code, is
the one commonly enforced in modern communal
bathing facilities. For example, in
Schwaben Quellen no clothing of any kind
is allowed. Other less strict undress codes
are common in public pools, especially
indoor pools, in which shoes and shirts are
not allowed. This undress code is an exact
reversal of the ubiquitous "no shoes, no
shirt, no service" dress code that exists
almost everywhere outside the public bathing
environment.
Places where
nudism is practised may be "clothing
optional", or nudity may be compulsory, with
exceptions, see
manners in nudism.
Gender and clothing
Various traditions suggests that certain
items of clothing intrinsically suit
different
gender roles. In particular, the wearing
of
skirts and
trousers
has given rise to common phrases expressing
implied restrictions in use and disapproval
of offending behaviour. For example, ancient
Greeks often considered the wearing of
trousers by
Persian men as a sign of
effeminacy.
Extreme flouting of conventions in this
area may earn the label "cross-dressing".
Clothing deficiencies
Clothing deficiencies may reduce
functionality and/or be unaesthetic, but
also be considered socially improper. As far
as other people know, a deficiency during
the rest of the day after an "accident" such
as a button falling off, a stain, or a tear,
is more "forgivable" than putting on
clothing like that on a new day. For poor
people, deficiencies which are difficult or
expensive to fix, these are not really
improper, but just somewhat sad, but
understandable.
Possible
deficiencies in clothing itself may
include:
- stains
- faded colour
- smell
- tears
- broken seams
- thin spots
- holes
- missing buttons
- broken
zippers
One or more
safety pins may temporarily alleviate
some of these imperfections.
Possible inappropriate clothing relative
to the person wearing it includes garments:
- too large (wide, long)
- too small (tight, short)
- not corresponding to the sex, age or
peer group of the wearer
Possible "inappropriate" or socially
unacceptable ways of wearing clothing
include:
- unbuttoned (notably the fly)
- unzipped (ditto)
- backward
- inside-out
- mis-matched socks
- a wide dress, skirt or shorts
exposing underwear or genitals by the
way one sits, or when blown upwards (see
also
Marilyn Monroe), etc.
- a
bra,
wrongly positioned, revealing a breast
(one such "wardrobe
malfunction" has become notorious:
see
Janet Jackson).
Possible "inappropriate" or socially
unacceptable situations of
wetness include:
-
transparency, due to wetness (or
thin spots), exposing underwear or
intimate parts
- wetness due to
sweat
- wetness apparently due to
urine, etc.
Possible inappropriateness regarding
day-to-day variation of clothing:
Possible inappropriateness of clothing
relative to the occasion (note also the
concept of dress code):
- too bright or merry for a serious or
sad occasion, for example at a job
interview or at a
funeral
- too somber for a festive occasion
- insufficiently modest
- too formal
- causes a potential breakdown of the
command chain (for example, in school
situations, a teacher is required to
adhere to a much stricter dress code
than the students)
See also
wardrobe malfunction.
Deliberate violation of clothing taboos
Of course some of these clothing faux
pas may occur intentionally for reasons
of
fashion or
personal
preference. For example, people may wear
intentionally oversized clothing. For
instance, the
teenage boys of
rap duo
Kris Kross wore all of their clothes
backwards and extremely
baggy.
A common deliberate violation of clothing
taboos is the removal of the shirt, together
with pulling down the pants to show the
underpants
The trend in
underwear
has moved toward underwear that looks less
like underwear, e.g. instead of white briefs
that say "Mr Brief" or "Fruit of the Loom"
in large letters around the waistband,
trends have shifted toward undergarments
that look like bathing suits or
beach shorts.
However, some people are going back to the
plain white underwear with bold
underwearlike lettering around the
waistband, i.e. familiar underwear brand
names around the waistband, to enhance the
violation of the taboo against showing
underwear as a fashion statement. For women,
deliberately showing bra straps has also
become fashionable.
Mooning is the deliberate baring of the
buttocks as a gesture of teasing or
contempt.
Underwearing
See also
underwearing.
Some people strip down to their underwear
as a fashion statement, as a form of
protest, or to get attention (i.e. for
advertisement), in cases where one does not
want to go as far as being nude. As a
fashion statement, Tommy Hilfiger ran a
series of large billboard advertisements
showing mixed-gender groups wearing only
their underwear in public. For example,
groups were shown at outdoor splash areas,
frolicking in nothing but their underwear.
This implied a certain spontaneity, as one
might find at an
urban beach where people decide to strip
to their underwear to cool off in a fountain
on a hot summer day. Traditionally, people
would need a bathing suit, but because of
the popularization of underwearing, the
taboo against showing underwear has been
weakened, and in some ways reversed, making
the showing of underwear actually
fashionable.
Some groups protesting against fur have
adopted the phrase "I'd rather be in my
underwear than wear fur". Members may
confirm their words by stripping to their
underwear in public.
As a form of attention-getting,
freshpair.com has created "National
Underwear Day" and had large numbers of
models walk through
Times Square wearing nothing but their
underwear. This helped to draw tremendous
attention to the day and to freshpair.com.
Reversalism in the sociology of clothing
Social attitudes to clothing have brought
about various rules and social conventions,
such as keeping the body covered, and not
showing underwear in public. The backlash
against these social norms has become a
traditional form of rebellion.
Also, during the
2001 anthrax attacks, large numbers of
people stripped to their underwear in
parking lots and other public places, for
hosing down by fire departments, often in
front of TV news crews covering the events.
On the other hand, some people are
unwilling to violate their self-imposed and
fully internalized social norms of body
covering, even in a situation where mass
stripdowns and
washdowns could save their lives.
|
 |
|