Fashion Definitions — fashion history, brands and industry terms from Apparel Search
Bodymap, formed by David Holah and Stevie Stewart, was one of the brightest design teams to emerge in the 1980s. In the spirit of punk, Holah and Stewart turned the establishment upside down with their wild and unconventional clothes, including stretch clothes with pieces of fabric in unexpected places.
Bodymap, formed by David Holah and Stevie Stewart, was one of the brightest design teams to emerge in the 1980's. In the spirit of punk, Holah and Stewart turned the 'establishment' upside down with their wild and unconventional clothes. As the dress historian Kevin Almond has commented: "Holah's and Stewart's stretch clothes often had pieces of fabric in unexpected places, so that the emphasis was transferred from one place to another. In this case, they have borrowed the skirt-like apron from a pair of Seditionaries bondage trousers in an attempt to both hide and draw attention to a man's crotch."
| The above article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/david_holah 2/7/06 |
Designer Definition (from U.S Department of Labor)
|
Bodymap is presented as the work of two people together: David Holah and Stevie Stewart, who formed the team and are credited jointly throughout. That joint authorship shapes everything else said about the clothes. The designs are not described as one designer's personal signature softened by an assistant, but as the product of a partnership, and the judgements quoted are made about Holah and Stewart together — their clothes, their borrowings, their decisions. Bodymap is also placed firmly in its moment: one of the brightest design teams to emerge in the 1980s. Emergence matters in that description. The reputation rests on arriving as a new force within a specific decade, bringing something the established fashion order had not produced itself, rather than on a long career of gradual accumulation. A team that appears together, works together and is remembered together gives the 1980s a different kind of fashion figure from the lone couturier of an earlier model: the creative unit is the pair.
The spirit in which Bodymap worked is named directly: punk. In the spirit of punk, Holah and Stewart turned the establishment upside down with their wild and unconventional clothes. Each part of that description does work. Wild separates the clothes from restraint and good taste as governing values. Unconventional separates them from the accepted rules of how garments are normally put together. Turning the establishment upside down states the intention behind both qualities — the point was not simply to be different, but to invert what the existing order stood for, putting what it kept at the bottom on top. Punk here is therefore a method as much as a look: a way of treating the rules of dress as material to be overturned rather than guidance to be followed. Clothes made in that spirit announce their attitude before any individual detail is examined, because the refusal of convention is itself the design statement.
The most precise account of how the clothes worked comes from dress historian Kevin Almond. Holah's and Stewart's stretch clothes often had pieces of fabric in unexpected places, so that the emphasis was transferred from one place to another. That single observation explains a whole design technique. A garment normally directs attention by convention: the eye goes where cut, decoration and custom say it should. By putting pieces of fabric where they are not expected, the designers moved that attention deliberately. Emphasis becomes something the designer controls and relocates, rather than something fixed by the body's usual focal points. The choice of stretch fabric supports the technique — a close, flexible base lets added pieces sit where the designers want them and lets the garment carry displaced elements without losing its hold on the body. The result is clothing that rearranges the map of the body it covers, which is a fitting method for a team called Bodymap: the body is treated as a surface whose landmarks can be redrawn.
Almond's example makes the technique concrete. Holah and Stewart borrowed the skirt-like apron from a pair of Seditionaries bondage trousers in an attempt to both hide and draw attention to a man's crotch. The borrowing itself is instructive: a detail from bondage trousers, clothing rooted in an underground wardrobe, is lifted into their design and repurposed as an apron-like flap. The purpose Almond identifies is deliberately double. The apron hides the area it covers, and at the same time the presence of an unusual, borrowed element at exactly that place draws attention to it. Concealment and emphasis happen together, in the same piece of fabric. That paradox is the Bodymap approach in miniature — an element that does the opposite of what it appears to do, an establishment garment turned into its reverse, and a body zone whose emphasis has been transferred, hidden and highlighted all at once. Wild and unconventional, in this account, are not decoration added to ordinary clothes; they are what happens when every decision a garment makes is open to being inverted. That is also why the partnership itself is inseparable from the work: the method — overturn, relocate, conceal and reveal at once — is the Bodymap signature, and it belongs to Holah and Stewart together rather than to either name on its own.
Bodymap was the design team formed by David Holah and Stevie Stewart. It is described as one of the brightest design teams to emerge in the 1980s.
In the spirit of punk, they turned the establishment upside down with wild and unconventional clothes.
Kevin Almond commented that their stretch clothes often had pieces of fabric in unexpected places, so the emphasis was transferred from one place to another, and that they borrowed a skirt-like apron from Seditionaries bondage trousers to both hide and draw attention to a man's crotch.